Putem fi ţinuţi captivi doar în cuştile pe care nu vedem. O scurtă istorie a înrobirii umane - până la şi inclusiv dumneavoastră. De la Freedomain Radio, cea mai mare şi răspândită conversaţie filozofică din lume. (www.freedomainradio.com)
Sursa: http://www.fdrurl.com/slavestory
Subtitrare: lukasig.com
Sursa: http://www.fdrurl.com/slavestory
Subtitrare: lukasig.com
This is the story of your enslavement; how it came to be, and you can finally be free.
Like all animals, human beings want to dominate and exploit the resources around them.
At first, we mostly hunted and fished and ate off the land - but then
Like all animals, human beings want to dominate and exploit the resources around them.
At first, we mostly hunted and fished and ate off the land - but then
something magical and terrible happened to our minds.
We became, alone among the animals, afraid of death, and of future loss.
And this was the start of a great tragedy, and an even greater possibility...
You see, when we became afraid of death, of injury, and imprisonment,
we became controllable --
and so valuable -- in a way that no other resource could ever be.
The greatest resource for any human being to control is not natural resources,
The greatest resource for any human being to control is not natural resources,
or tools, or animals or land -- but other human beings.
You can frighten an animal, because animals are afraid of pain in the moment, but you
cannot frighten an animal with a loss of liberty, or with torture or imprisonment in the future,
because animals have very little sense of tomorrow.
You cannot threaten a cow with torture, or a sheep with death.
You cannot swing a sword at a tree and scream at it to produce more fruit,
or hold a burning torch to a field and demand more wheat.
You cannot get more eggs by threatening a hen - but you can get a man
to give you his eggs by threatening him.
Human farming has been the most profitable -- and destructive --
occupation throughout history, and it is now reaching its destructive climax.
Human society cannot be rationally understood until it is seen for what it is:
a series of farms where human farmers own human livestock.
Some people get confused because governments
provide healthcare and water and education and roads,
and thus imagine that there is some benevolence at work.
Nothing could be further from reality.
Farmers provide healthcare and irrigation and training to their livestock.
Some people get confused because we are allowed certain liberties, and thus imagine
Nothing could be further from reality.
Farmers provide healthcare and irrigation and training to their livestock.
Some people get confused because we are allowed certain liberties, and thus imagine
that our government protects our freedoms.
But farmers plant their crops a certain distance apart to increase their yields -- and will allow
certain animals larger stalls or fields if it means they will produce more meat and milk.
In your country, your tax farm, your farmer grants you certain freedoms not because he cares
about your liberties, but because he wants to increase his profits.
Are you beginning to see the nature of the cage you were born into?
There have been four major phases of human farming.
The first phase, in ancient Egypt, was direct and brutal human compulsion.
Are you beginning to see the nature of the cage you were born into?
There have been four major phases of human farming.
The first phase, in ancient Egypt, was direct and brutal human compulsion.
Human bodies were controlled, but the creative productivity of the human mind
remained outside the reach of the whip and the brand and the shackles.
Slaves remained woefully under-productive and required enormous resources
to control.
The second phase was the Roman model, wherein slaves were granted
some capacity for freedom, ingenuity and creativity, which raised their productivity.
This increased the wealth of Rome, and thus
the tax income of the Roman government - and with this additional wealth,
Rome became an empire,
destroying the economic freedoms that fed its power, and collapsed.
I'm sure that this does not seem entirely unfamiliar.
After the collapse of Rome, the feudal model introduced the concept of livestock
ownership and taxation. Instead of being directly owned, peasants farmed land
that they could retain
as long as they paid off the local warlords. This model broke down due to the
continual subdivision of productive land, and was destroyed during the
Enclosure movement, when land was consolidated, and
hundreds of thousands of peasants were kicked off their ancestral lands,
because new farming techniques made
larger farms more productive with fewer people.
The increased productivity of the late Middle Ages created the excess food required
for the expansion of towns and cities, which in turn gave rise
to the modern Democratic model of human ownership.
As displaced peasants flooded into the cities, a huge stock of cheap human capital
became available to the rising industrialists - and the ruling class of human farmers
quickly realized that they could make more money by letting their livestock
choose their own occupations.
Under the Democratic model, direct slave ownership has been replaced
by the Mafia model. The Mafia rarely owns businesses directly, but rather sends
thugs around once a month to steal from the business "owners."
You are now allowed to choose your own occupation, which raises your productivity -
and thus the taxes you can pay to your masters.
Your few freedoms are preserved because they are profitable to your owners.
The great challenge of the Democratic model is that increases in wealth and freedom
threaten the farmers. The ruling classes initially profit from a relatively free market
in capital and labor, but as their livestock become more used to their freedoms and
growing wealth, they begin to question why they need rulers at all.
Ah well. Nobody ever said that human farming was easy.
Keeping the tax livestock securely in the compounds of the ruling classes
is a three phase process.
The first is to indoctrinate the young through government "education."
The first is to indoctrinate the young through government "education."
As the wealth of democratic countries grew, government schools were universally
inflicted in order to control the thoughts and souls of the livestock.
The second is to turn citizens against each other through
the creation of dependent livestock.
It is very difficult to rule human beings directly through force --
It is very difficult to rule human beings directly through force --
and where it can be achieved, it remains cripplingly under-productive,
as can be seen in North Korea. Humans do not breed well
or produce efficiently in direct captivity.
If human beings believe that they are free, then they will produce much more
for their farmers. The best way to maintain this illusion of freedom is to put some
of the livestock on the payroll of the farmer. Those cows that become dependent
on the existing hierarchy will then attack any other cows who point out the violence,
hypocrisy and immorality of human ownership.
Freedom is slavery, and slavery is freedom.
If you can get the cows to attack each other whenever anybody brings up the reality
of their situation, then you don't have to spend nearly as much controlling them directly.
Those cows who become dependent upon the stolen largess of the farmer
will violently oppose any questioning of the virtue of human ownership -- and the
intellectual and artistic classes, always and forever dependent
upon the farmers -- will say, to anyone who demands freedom from ownership:
"You will harm your fellow cows."
The livestock are kept enclosed by shifting the moral responsibility
for the destructiveness of a violent system to those who demand real freedom.
The third phase is to invent continual external threats, so that the frightened
livestock cling to the "protection" of the farmers.
This system of human farming is now nearing its end.
The terrible tragedy of the modern American system has occurred
not in spite of, but because of past economic freedoms.
The massive increases in American wealth throughout the 19th century
resulted from economic freedom -- and it was this very increase in wealth
that fed the size and power of the state.
Whenever the livestock become exponentially more productive, you get
a corresponding increase in the number of farmers and their dependents.
The growth of the state is always proportional to the preceding
economic freedoms.
Economic freedoms create wealth, and the wealth attracts more thieves
Economic freedoms create wealth, and the wealth attracts more thieves
and political parasites, whose greed then destroys the economic freedoms.
In other words, freedom metastasizes the cancer of the state.
The government that starts off the smallest will always end up the largest.
This is why there can be no viable and sustainable alternative
to a truly free and peaceful society.
A society without political rulers, without human ownership,
A society without political rulers, without human ownership,
without the violence of taxation and statism...
To be truly free is both very easy, and very hard.
We avoid the horror of our enslavement because it is painful to see it directly.
We dance around the violence of our dying system
because we fear the attacks of our fellow livestock.
But we can only be kept in the cages we refuse to see.
Wake up...
To see the farm is to leave it.
